Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from JNRBM and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

Exclusion of eleven candidate genes for ocular melanosis in cairn terriers

Paige A Winkler1, Joshua T Bartoe1, Celeste R Quinones1, Patrick J Venta2 and Simon M Petersen-Jones1*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, 48824, East Lansing, MI, USA

2 Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, 48824, East Lansing, MI, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine 2013, 12:6  doi:10.1186/1477-5751-12-6


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jnrbm.com/content/12/1/6


Received:19 July 2012
Accepted:4 February 2013
Published:1 March 2013

© 2013 Winkler et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Ocular melanosis of Cairn terrier dogs is an inherited defect characterized by progressive pigmentation of both eyes which can result in glaucoma and blindness. Pedigree analysis suggests the trait has an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. We selected 11 potential candidate genes and used an exclusion analysis approach to investigate the likelihood that one of the candidate gene loci contained the Cairn terrier-ocular melanosis locus.

Results

Two polymorphic loci were identified within or close to each candidate gene. Genotyping of at least 10 ocular melanosis Cairn terriers for each marker showed that there was no single shared allele for either of the two polymorphic markers identified in ASIP, COMT, GPNMB, GSK3B, LYST, MC1R, MITF, SILV, TYR, TYRP1,and TYRP2. This is strong evidence to exclude each locus as the site of the ocular melanosis mutation (probability of a false exclusion calculated for each gene ranged from 1.59 × 10-4 to 1 × 10-9).

Conclusions

None of the 11 potential candidate genes selected are likely to be the gene locus for ocular melanosis in Cairn terriers.

Keywords:
Dog; Glaucoma; Ocular melanosis; Pigmentary glaucoma; Candidate gene

Background

Ocular melanosis (OM) is a hereditary condition in the Cairn terrier breed of dog that is characterized by proliferation and migration of pigmented cells starting in the anterior uvea of both eyes. The pigmented cells result in a diffuse expansion of the root of the iris and are also shed into the aqueous humor. They accumulate in the anterior sclera which develops pigment plaques that progressively increase in size, possibly reaching that site via the conventional aqueous drainage pathways [1,2]. Eventually the aqueous drainage pathways become blocked with pigment results in secondary glaucoma and vision loss. The pigmented cells appear to be primarily melanocytes although some admixture with melanophages (macrophages that have ingested melanosomes) does occur [3]. The pigmented cells also reach the posterior segment of the eye and over time can be seen to slowly migrate into and obscure the tapetum [2]. The posterior sclera also becomes pigmented and pigment can be found in the meninges around the optic nerve. Transformation to develop solid melanocytic tumors occurs in some cases and was reported in 3 dogs in a series of 114 ocular melanosis affected Cairn terriers [3].

Cairn terrier OM shares some similarities with human pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS). PDS patients accumulate pigment within the trabecular meshwork, and a subset (approximately 35% by 35 years following PDS diagnosis) develop pigmentary glaucoma (PG) [4]. This condition accounts for 1–1.5% of human glaucoma cases seen in the Western world [5]. Although the PDS causative mutation/s has yet to be identified, the phenotype has been linked to the telomere region (7q35-q36) of human chromosome 7 [6].

Rodent models with pigment changes similar to human PDS and PG, and pseudoexfoliation have been described. In the DBA/2 J mouse, mutations in GPNMB and TYRP1 result in iris pigment dispersion and iris stromal atrophy respectively and mice homozygous for recessive alleles at both loci have earlier onset and more severe disease [7,8]. Clinically this mouse model closely resembles Cairn terrier OM. More recently a mutation in LYST has been shown to cause iris transillumination defects in mice [9].

OM in Cairn terriers represents a potentially important large animal model for investigation of human PDS and PG. Pedigree analysis indicates that Cairn terrier OM is likely to be inherited as an autosomal dominant trait [2]. We tested the hypothesis that one of 11 candidate genes has suffered a mutation that causes OM phenotype by examination of allele sharing of genetic markers close to or within each gene. Using an association-based form of exclusion analysis (as opposed to pedigree-based exclusion analysis), we provide evidence that strongly supports the exclusion of these 11 candidate genes from association with OM in the Cairn terrier.

Results

Candidate genes

Eleven potential candidate genes for ocular melanosis were selected: agouti signaling protein (ASIP), catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT), glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB), glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta (GSK3B), lysosomal trafficking regulator (LYST), melanocortin 1 receptor (MCIR), microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF), silver (SILV), tyrosinase (TYR), tyrosinase related protein 1 (TYRP1), and Tyrosinase related protein 2 (TYRP2). For each gene two polymorphic markers were identified (11 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 9 microsatellites (MS), 2 insertion/deletions (in/dels)) that could be used to test for association of the candidate locus with Cairn terrier OM. Details of the candidate genes and markers are shown in Table  1.

Table 1. Candidate genes for Cairn terrier ocular melanosis with markers, chromosomal positions, and PCR primers

The exclusion analysis

Exclusion analysis was performed under several assumptions that are considered to be robust for canine Mendelian disorders; (1) all affected dogs share the same causal mutation, which is identical by descent due to a founder event (very likely, based upon previous results for common Mendelian mutations in purebred dogs; see Discussion), (2) no recombination has occurred between the marker and the mutation since the time the unique mutational event occurred (markers are very close to the gene and the probability of a rare event is calculated and presented), and (3) no new mutations have occurred in either the marker or the gene (also included in the probability calculation for a false exclusion). It is important to understand that, for the purpose of exclusions, only affected dogs are needed. This is analogous to exclusion in paternity testing. If an accused male does not share marker alleles with the baby, he cannot be the father; knowing or not knowing the marker allele frequencies in the population has no impact on the exclusion. It is only necessary to have allele frequency information when the alleles in the offspring are consistent with those of the accused male in order to provide a probability statement on how likely this match is compared to other possible males in the population. We sought to exclude most candidate genes as quickly and affordably as possible because only one gene can underlie a Mendelian disorder due to a founder event and the rest of the candidate genes are “innocent” with respect to the disease under examination. An advantage to this approach is the cost savings obtained because it is not necessary to genotype unaffected controls. Controls only need to be genotyped if a gene cannot be excluded, in order to obtain positive evidence of an association between a locus and the disease phenotype. Note also that penetrance is not an issue because all Cairn terriers genotyped are affected and must share the necessary allele.

With a likely dominant mode of inheritance, markers within or close to the gene harboring the causal mutation (or a necessary locus) would have at least one shared allele between affected dogs. For each of the 22 markers genotyped there was no shared single allele between the OM-affected dogs thus providing evidence that none of the candidate genes underlie OM (Additional file 1: Table S1 and Table S2). We then calculated the probability of falsely excluding the candidate genes: the p values ranged from 1.59 × 10-4 to 1.0 × 10-9 (Table  1 and Additional file 2), making it very unlikely that any one the 11 candidate genes tested contains the OM mutation.

Additional file 1: Table S1. Genotyping results for microsatellites on the ABI 3130 genetic analyzer. Dogs with one recombination or mutation event are boxed. Light gray boxes indicate a second recombination or mutation event. Dark gray boxes indicate a third recombination or mutation event. Table S2. Biallelic genotyping results. Biallelic genotyping results with SNP information, SNP # correlates with Table 1, SNP position.

Format: XLS Size: 42KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Excel ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 2. Supplementary Methods. Example of p value calculations using microsatellite markers.

Format: DOC Size: 31KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Discussion

Linkage-based and sequence-based exclusion analyses have been used in many studies to eliminate candidate genes hypothesized to underlie inherited phenotypes in dogs (for example: [11-13]). With late-onset conditions such as ocular melanosis compiling pedigrees (DNA and phenotypes from multiple offspring and at least one parent) can be difficult because it may not be possible to locate the siblings or the parents of affected animals, or they may already be dead. Sequencing of candidate genes can be time consuming and since the commonest approach is to sequence only the exons and flanking portions of the introns, the method could miss causal mutations in non-coding regions. In this study we used association-based exclusion analysis, a technique that requires only the use of animals affected with the condition and can be used for rapid exclusion of candidate loci. Obviously the hope is to identify a candidate locus that cannot be excluded and would thus warrant further investigation as the potential site of the disease causing mutation. Using association-based exclusion analysis we were able to exclude with high probability 11 candidate genes for OM in Cairn terriers.

We argue here that the assumptions (no locus or allelic heterogeneity, or recombination and/or new mutations, as listed in the Results section) that underlie this approach are appropriate. Giger and colleagues noted that, with very few exceptions, the causative mutations that have been identified for canine genetic diseases are breed specific or affect very closely related breeds [14]. The relative rarity of a Cairn terrier-ocular melanosis-like condition in any other breed of dog makes it very likely that this condition also resulted from a single mutation event.

We have estimated the probability of a recombination event causing a false exclusion of the true locus based upon the average recombination rate in dogs (1 cM/Mb). It has been suggested most chromosomal recombination occurs in “hotspots” in the human genome and 50% of all recombination occurs in less than 10% of the sequence [15]. In addition, recombination hotspots are relatively rare within or close to genes [16]. Although the region of linkage disequilibrium becomes smaller with increasing numbers of meiotic events (generations) after the founder mutation occurred, the timing of the first descriptions of ocular melanosis in Cairn terriers and the increasing incidence of glaucoma in the breed [17], suggests that the mutant allele became relatively common in the breed within recent time (probably less than 10 generations ago [2] and unpublished results). Thus, by using two markers, the average recombination rate becomes a conservative estimate, because of the small probability of the occurrence of two hotspots within or near a gene that would lead to a false exclusion.

Although it has been commented in several publications that some canine MS have observable mutations, to our knowledge no actual tabulation of mutation rate data has been published [18,19]. However, mutation rate data are available for humans, with the highest rates equivalent to about 1 mutation per 100 meioses [20]. We have used this highest human mutation rate as our estimation of the rate of mutation at our MS. Although it is possible that canine MS mutation rates could be greater than this estimate, rates in dogs as little as two-fold higher would likely have been previously detected and published. With the approach used here, two rare events (recombinations and/or marker mutations) would have to occur to falsely exclude the causative gene. We also note for exclusion analysis, recombinations and mutations at loci which do not contain the disease causing mutation do not alter the conclusions inferred from the analysis; the only concern is for violations of the underlying assumptions at the causal locus, leading to a false exclusion. With this approach and a single, necessary gene being responsible for the disease, most candidate genes can be screened in a relatively rapid and cost-effective manner. In this particular case, it is highly unlikely that the causal gene is among these 11 candidates.

Conclusions

This study provides strong evidence to exclude 11 potential candidate genes from association with the Cairn terrier OM locus. Further studies are required to identify the gene mutation that is causal for this condition.

Methods

Animals

DNA was extracted by standard techniques from blood samples from privately owned pet Cairn terriers that had been diagnosed with OM by a veterinary ophthalmologist. The clinical information provided was reviewed by SPJ or JTB. All procedures were in compliance with the ARVO statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and covered by Michigan State University IACUC AUFs 05-08-076-00 or 05-11-106-00.

Development of polymorphic markers for candidate genes

Candidate genes were selected because they either had a known involvement in ocular pigmentary disturbances in other species or a role in melanocytes and melanosome development.

Two polymorphic markers were developed for each gene (Table  1). Microsatellites (MS) were identified from the USCS Genome Browser ( http://genome.ucsc.edu/ webcite) May 2005 build of the canine genome using the repeat masker track. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were selected from the list of canine SNPs published by the Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ( http://www.broadinstitute.org/mammals/dog webcite). With the exception of COMT MS1 and GPNMB SNP2 all markers were within 600 kb from the furthest end of the candidate for which they were selected. Primers to amplify each marker by polymerase chain reaction were designed using the Primer3 program ( http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/ webcite). A universal labeling method was employed to fluorescently label the MS PCR products [21]. The MS markers were sized on an ABI PRISM 3130 genetic analyzer (Additional file 1: Table S1). Restriction enzyme digest assays were designed to allow genotyping of several of the SNPs (restriction enzymes shown in Table  1) and the other SNPs genotyped by direct sequencing of the PCR products (Additional file 1:Table S2).

Calculation of probability of falsely excluding a genetic locus

Markers close to the causal gene mutation are likely to be identical by descent in all affected alleles unless a recombination event between marker and mutation occurred or the marker mutated. Either event could lead to falsely excluding the candidate locus. Therefore, the probability of a false exclusion of the causal gene due to such inconsistencies was calculated (see Additional file 2 for an example of calculations). We first counted the number of necessary recombination/mutation events to obtain the genotype that would result in a false exclusion of the true culprit gene. Then the greater of the two probabilities of a recombination and a marker mutation was used for subsequent calculations. In all cases, if a marker was a SNP or an insertion/deletion the probability of a recombination was used (i.e., a recurrent SNP and insertion/deletion mutation is assumed to be always rarer than the probability of a recombination event for the data reported here). The probability of a recombination event was assumed to be proportional to the distance of the marker to the end of the most distant exon. The recombination rate per unit of DNA is equivalent to 1 cM per Mb in the dog, based upon the estimates that the autosomal sex-averaged linkage map is 26.5 Morgans [22], and the physical map is 2631 Mb [23]. For all MS, the probability of a marker mutation was assumed to be 0.01, based upon the mutation rate for a canine MS set at the highest mutation rate seen among human MS [20]. The probabilities for each recombination or marker mutation event were then multiplied for both markers if they flanked the gene on opposite sides, or for the number of steps for a single marker if it was contained within the gene (note that for markers that do not flank both sides of a gene, it is possible for a single recombination to produce non-shared alleles for both markers, although the much tighter linkage for markers contained within a gene can often make up for this disadvantage). The probability was then adjusted for the estimated number of generations (independent chances for a recombination/mutation) since the foundation event; 1 – (1 – p)n, where n equals the estimated number of generations since the foundation event (in this case, ten generations – based on first descriptions of OM).

Abbreviations

OM: Ocular melanosis;ASIP: Agouti signaling protein;COMT: Catechol-o-methyltransferase;GPNMB: Glycoprotein NMB;GSK3B: Glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta;LYST: Lysosomal trafficking regulator;MCIR: Melanocortin 1 receptor;MITF: Microphthalmia transcription factor;SILV: Silver;TYR: Tyrosinase;TYRP1: Tyrosinase related protein 1;TYRP2: Tyrosinase related protein 2

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

PAW: Investigated most of the candidate genes and helped write the paper. JTB: Reviewed clinical information for the OM-affected dogs and helped write the paper. CRQ: Investigated some of the candidate genes. PJV: Provided advice for exclusion analysis and calculated the probability of a false exclusion and helped write the paper. SMPJ: Obtained funding, selected most of the candidate genes, examined some affected dogs and reviewed clinical descriptions of affected dogs. Coordinated writing of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

All the veterinarians and veterinary ophthalmologists who provided clinical cases and blood samples. All the breeders and owners of Cairn terriers used in the study. Funding from the Cairn Terrier Club of America Foundation and American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation. SPJ is the Myers-Dunlap Endowed Professor of Canine Health.

References

  1. Petersen-Jones SM: Abnormal ocular pigment deposition associated with glaucoma in the cairn terrier.

    J Small Anim Pract 1991, 32:19-22. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Petersen-Jones SM, Forcier JQ, Mentzer AE: Ocular melanosis in the cairn terrier: clinical description and investigation of mode of inheritance.

    Vet Ophthalmol 2007, 10(Supplement 1):63-69. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Petersen-Jones SM, Mentzer AL, Dubielzig RR, Render JA, Steficek BA, Kiupel M: Ocular melanosis in the cairn terrier: histopathological description of the condition, and immunohistological and ultrastructural characterization of the characteristic pigment-laden cells.

    Vet Ophthalmol 2008, 11:260-268. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Niyadurupola N, Broadway DC: Pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma–a major review.

    Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2008, 36:868-882. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Yang JW, Sakiyalak D, Krupin T: Pigmentary glaucoma.

    J Glaucoma 2001, 10:S30-S32. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Andersen JS, Pralea AM, DelBono EA, Haines JL, Gorin MB, Schuman JS, Mattox CG, Wiggs JL: A gene responsible for the pigment dispersion syndrome maps to chromosome 7q35-q36.

    Arch Ophthalmol 1997, 115:384-388. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. John SW, Smith RS, Savinova OV, Hawes NL, Chang B, Turnbull D, Davisson M, Roderick TH, Heckenlively JR: Essential iris atrophy, pigment dispersion, and glaucoma in DBA/2 J mice [published erratum appears in invest ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998 Aug;39(9):1641].

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998, 39:951-962. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Anderson MG, Smith RS, Hawes NL, Zabaleta A, Chang B, Wiggs JL, John SW: Mutations in genes encoding melanosomal proteins cause pigmentary glaucoma in DBA/2 J mice.

    Nat Genet 2002, 30:81-85. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Trantow CM, Mao M, Petersen GE, Alward EM, Alward WL, Fingert JH, Anderson MG: Lyst mutation in mice recapitulates iris defects of human exfoliation syndrome.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009, 50:1205-1214. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  10. Clark AG: Inference of haplotypes from PCR-amplified samples of diploid populations.

    Mol Biol Evol 1990, 7:111-122. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Wiik AC, Ropstad EO, Bjerkas E, Lingaas F: A study of candidate genes for day blindness in the standard wire haired dachshund.

    BMC Vet Res 2008, 4:23. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  12. Muller C, Distl O: Scanning 17 candidate genes for association with primary cataracts in the wire-haired dachshund.

    Vet J 2009, 182:342-345. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Meurs KM, Hendrix KP, Norgard MM: Molecular evaluation of five cardiac genes in doberman pinschers with dilated cardiomyopathy.

    Am J Vet Res 2008, 69:1050-1053. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Giger U, Sargan DR, McNiel EA: Breed-specific hereditary diseases and genetic screening. In The Dog and its genome. Volume First edition. Edited by Ostrander EA, Giger U, Lindblad-Toh K. Cold Spring harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2006:249-290. OpenURL

  15. McVean GA, Myers SR, Hunt S, Deloukas P, Bentley DR, Donnelly P: The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome.

    Science 2004, 304:581-584. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Myers S, Bottolo L, Freeman C, McVean G, Donnelly P: A fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots across the human genome.

    Science 2005, 310:321-324. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Gelatt KN, MacKay EO: Prevalence of the breed-related glaucomas in pure-bred dogs in North America.

    Vet Ophthalmol 2004, 7:97-111. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Francisco LV, Langston AA, Mellersh CS, Neal CL, Ostrander EA: A class of highly polymorphic tetranucleotide repeats for canine genetic mapping.

    Mammal Genome 1996, 7:359-362. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Irion DN, Schaffer AL, Famula TR, Eggleston ML, Hughes SS, Pedersen NC: Analysis of genetic variation in 28 dog breed populations with 100 microsatellite markers.

    J Hered 2003, 94:81-87. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Brinkmann B, Klintschar M, Neuhuber F, Huhne J, Rolf B: Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat.

    Am J Hum Genet 1998, 62:1408-1415. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  21. Neilan BA, Wilton AN, Jacobs D: A universal procedure for primer labelling of amplicons.

    Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25:2938-2939. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  22. Neff MW, Broman KW, Mellersh CS, Ray K, Acland GM, Aguirre GD, Ziegle JS, Ostrander EA, Rine J: A second-generation genetic linkage map of the domestic dog, canis familiaris.

    Genetics 1999, 151:803-820. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  23. Breen M, Hitte C, Lorentzen TD, Thomas R, Cadieu E, Sabacan L, Scott A, Evanno G, Parker HG, Kirkness EF: An integrated 4249 marker FISH/RH map of the canine genome.

    BMC Genomics 2004, 5:65. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL